on trauma
p. 21
Van der Kolk describes trauma not merely as a past event, but as a lasting "imprint... on mind, brain, and body"
p. 81
He highlights that trauma forces individuals to live as if the danger is still present.
p. 314
and represents an inability to be fully present.
These images made me stop, and then I thought about a friend.
There had been a distance between us for a while. The words I used in my last visit stayed with me for a long time. I had said something I thought was honest. He went quiet in a way that was longer than what I would have been used to. We have probably not seen each for close to a year.
In my processing at the time, I have deemed this friend "sensitive" and that I "touched a nerve". I also abstained from saying more, cause I was no longer trusted for him to feel unjudged. Also, I had no capacity to right the wrong at the time.
That was my understanding, until the pages came.
I assume that the distance we currently have is because he felt judged. He feels unsafe, and that would have triggered more unpleasantness in terms of how to deal with me and how to deal with his own emotions.
Then I realised, the withdrawal was not rejection but his own protection. I can only imagine his trauma resurfaced in motion.
I sat with that, and then I turned the same lens on myself:
How many times had I withdrawn from my own inner life, from feelings I had no language for, needs I had buried so long I forgot they were there?
Recently, I reacted to a statement by a peer during a work event. The reaction was not offensive but as someone who identifies as a nonviolent advocate, I still cringe at the thought of my own reactive expression. Why couldn't I just let it go?